Network Cables Online Blog    

So what causes the signal to attenuate?, and where does the crosstalk come from?
Below are of some of the terms used in high performance cable testing, and a description of what they mean.

Length
The length of a cable is one of the more obvious causes of attenuation because the longer it is, the more resistance it has, and therefore less of the signal will get through. To measure the length, a cable tester uses Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR). A pulse is sent down the cable and when it reaches the far end it reflects back, by measuring the time it takes to travel down the cable and back again, the tester can determine how long the cable is. To do this, the tester also needs to know how fast the pulsed signal is travelling, this is called the Nominal Velocity of Propagation (NVP) and is expressed as a percentage of the speed of light. The NVP is usually somewhere between 60% and 90% of the speed of light, with most Cat 5E cables being around 70%. Due to the twists in the cable, the measured length will be greater than the physical length, so if a run looks like it might be over 80m it would be wise to check it before it is tied up and terminated.

Wire Map
This test is to ensure that the two ends have been terminated pin for pin, i.e. that pin 1 at the patch panel goes to pin 1 at the outlet, pin 2 goes to pin 2 etc. etc. The wire map also checks for continuity, shorts, crossed pairs, reversed pairs and split pairs. A Split pair is probably the only thing that requires an explanation here, as they are undetectable with a simple continuity tester, this is because pin for pin they seem to be correct. As explained on the Cabling Basics page, balanced line operation requires that the signal is transmitted over a pair of wires that are twisted together, with a ’split pair’ the signal would be split between two different pairs.

Return Loss
When a cable is manufactured there are slight imperfections in the copper. These imperfections all contribute to the Structural Return Loss (SRL) measurement because each one causes an impedance mismatch which adds to the cables attenuation.DC loop resistance
This is simply the resistance between the two conductors of a twisted pair which is looped back at the far end. The primary purpose of this test is to make sure that there are no high resistance connections in the link.

Attenuation
This is the decrease in signal strength (expressed as negative dB) from one end of a cable to the other. The main causes of attenuation are impedance,
temperature, skin effect and dielectric loss. Impedance is the combination of resistance, inductance and capacitance in a cable, it is measured in Ohms and opposes the flow of current. Skin effect is phenomena which happens at high frequencies where the signal tries to escape from the confines of the copper and into the air. The signal travels along the outer ’skin’ of the copper which effectively reduces the cross sectional area of the cable and therefore increases its resistance.

NEXT
This stands for Near End cross Talk, and it occurs because alternating current flow produces an electromagnetic field around the cable, this field then induces a current flow in adjacent cables. The strength of this field increases with the frequency of the signal, and because the speed of data transmissions is ever increasing, NEXT is a big problem.The name ‘Cross Talk’ comes from the telecommunications industry, you may have heard a faint conversation in the background while on the phone yourself, this is caused by the electromagnetic effect between adjacent telephone wires. In the transmission of data, cross talk is at its highest level in the RJ45 connection as it enters the cable, or at the ‘Near End’. The term ‘Near End’ is slightly confusing because data can travel in both directions, and the NEXT test is carried out in both directions automatically by the tester, so the NEXT result is relative to the end of the cable that it was carried out on.
The twists in a cable help to cancel out the effects of NEXT and the more twists there are, the better the cancellation, however, the twists also increase attenuation, so there is a trade off between NEXT cancellation and attenuation. The twist rates in data cables are optimised for the best overall performance, the twist rates are also varied for each pair within the cable to help combat crosstalk.

PSNEXT
This stands for Power Sum Near End Cross Talk and is actually just a calculation. When a tester carries out the NEXT test it measures the cross talk on each pair as affected by each of the other three pairs individually, PSNEXT is simply the addition of the three NEXT results for each pair. So this is the combined effect that a pair would be subject to when used in a network that supports a four pair transmissions method, e.g.. Gigabit Ethernet.

FEXT, ELFEXT and PSELFEXT
Basically, Far End Cross Talk (FEXT) is like NEXT but it is measured at the far end (well that seems logical!). However, on its own FEXT doesn’t mean much because the length of the cable determines how much the signal is attenuated before it can affect the pairs at the far end. To compensate for this, and to provide a more meaningful result, the attenuation is subtracted from the FEXT test and the result is then called Equal Level Far End Cross Talk (ELFEXT).
And of course, no test parameter these days would be complete without adding the results together for each pair and calling it a Power Sum measurement, so now we have Power Sum Equal Level Far End Cross Talk or PSELFEXT for short.

Delay
This is the propagation delay or the time it takes for the signal to travel from one end of the cable to the other, it is not very important on it own because it value is directly proportional to the length of the cable. What is important is the relationship between the delays on each of the four pairs. This brings us nicely on to …………………….

Delay Skew
Now this is important, Delay Skew is the difference between the fastest and slowest pairs. Some networks use a four pair transmission method, this means that the signal is split into four, sent down the four pairs in the cable and re-combined at the far end. It is essential that the signals reach the far end at near enough the same time, otherwise the signal will not be re-combined correctly.

Q. The company I work for is interested in installing network cabling for residential homes in the construction phase (as the home
is being built) well I am supposed to make some brochure about this and I have no idea where to even start. Some of the things I now I need (text information) are: why is it going to benefit the consumer and builder, what are the perks of having network cable, and why is it easier and a more efficient way to connect to the internet. I am not asking you for the answers but I would like to know if you can suggest any web sites that I may find information about the questions I asked above.
Thank you for your time

A. This is a big question!

First of all, we are in the ‘Information Age’ and more and more households are using the internet and have more than one computer. Because of this, home networking is becoming commonplace and it is a more efficient method of connecting two or three computers to the internet over one phone line or DSL (Digital Subscriber Line).

The main benefits of installing the cabling during construction are the cost and ease of implementation. Cable is fairly inexpensive and installing it during the building work is far easier than trying to do it once the property is finished and decorated. I get a lot of email from people all over the world who are cabling their houses to connect PC’s together, and hiding cables in wall cavities or chasing out and re-plastering is not an easy task for them, unlike most office environments where this is not such an issue.

Another point worth raising is that residential cabling is not just for connecting PC’s together. ‘Smart Houses’ also use intelligent devices such as alarm systems, refrigerators and heating/air conditioning systems all of which can be networked to a controlling PC or accessed via the Internet when you are away from home. OK, you may be asking why would we need to? but it is starting to happen. And, of course, the cabling system can also be used for telephones, which makes adding an extension phone as simple as plugging it in at the nearest cabling outlet and patching it through at the panel.

Q. We have a small Pier to Pier network setup with 13 systems and one printer connected to 2 eight port hubs. We are having all kinds of instability with the network. A station might see all the other stations on the network but they can’t see him or visa-versa. Sometimes it will appear and other times not.
When we made the cables for the stations, we used cat 5 cable (4prs) with the following wiring:
Pin 1 wht/org, Pin 2 org/wht, Pin 3 wht/grn, Pin 4 grn/wht, Pin 5 wht/blu, Pin 6 blu/wht, Pin 7 wht/brn, Pin 8 brn/wht.

We tested them using a TBase cable tester, and they passed just fine. Looking at your diagram for correct wiring, it looks like you have some colored wires in different locations, but it is still pin for pin. Is there a reason why ours would be causing our problems?

A. Regarding your question on RJ45 pinouts, I would say that you are probably experiencing crosstalk problems.

The reason is this, Ethernet uses pins 1 & 2 and 3 & 6 on 10/100BaseT networks (I know it’s a funny way to do it but thats how it is!). One pair is used for transmit and the other pair for receive, so pins 1 & 2 at one end will connect to pins 3 & 6 on the other end and vice versa. In the correct wiring configuration each signal path (transmit or receive) is on its own twisted pair of wires, the twists help to eliminate crosstalk. With your wiring, pins 3 & 6 are split between the green and blue pairs making them susceptible to crosstalk (or noise), this also gets worse when using higher speeds (100BaseT or Gigabit Ethernet).

The reason your tester didn’t pick it up is because it only tests for continuity, shorts, crossed pairs etc. (not split pairs) you would have to use a scanner (like the Fluke DSP4000 or MicroTest OmniScanner) to find a split pair.